* Relationship to Root Query

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
Post Reply
User avatar
BenOakster
Platinum
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Aug 2024 16:38
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Relationship to Root Query

Post by BenOakster »

I am the root in my project and I am divorced. Is there a way to have the relationship to root column not show the relationship to me of my ex-wife's ancestors?

I have no need to see that a person in my tree, (kept due to my children having those ancestors of course), is possibly my ex-wife's great aunt.
Last edited by BenOakster on 09 Aug 2024 07:12, edited 1 time in total.
Ben Oakley - Researching OAKLEY, HART, HALL, PECK, FARRANCE, CRICK, WELLS, SCARFE in Suffolk/Norfolk.

oakleygenealogy.co.uk
User avatar
BenOakster
Platinum
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Aug 2024 16:38
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: Realtionship to Root Query

Post by BenOakster »

I have now unlinked them. Is this the right way or will this cause issues further down the road?

EDIT: No, this then removes them from the marriage tags etc and so I married NO SPOUSE. Re-linked.
Ben Oakley - Researching OAKLEY, HART, HALL, PECK, FARRANCE, CRICK, WELLS, SCARFE in Suffolk/Norfolk.

oakleygenealogy.co.uk
User avatar
Jane
Site Admin
Posts: 8543
Joined: 01 Nov 2002 15:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Somerset, England
Contact:

Re: Relationship to Root Query

Post by Jane »

If is only the Records Window you could change the column to

Code: Select all

=TextIf(RelationCode(FileRoot(),%INDI%,SPOUSE_START,1) = 1," ",Relationship(FileRoot()))
This will not change the output on the Focus window, but will work on the records window and in diagrams if you change the expression.
Jane
My Family History : My Photography "Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad."
User avatar
BenOakster
Platinum
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Aug 2024 16:38
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: Relationship to Root Query

Post by BenOakster »

Many thanks Jane. I didn't even think to configure the column, not that I would have been able to do it anyway, but getting used to a new program is hard!

I'm getting there though and I'm closer to switching from TMG as these bits get cleared up.
Ben Oakley - Researching OAKLEY, HART, HALL, PECK, FARRANCE, CRICK, WELLS, SCARFE in Suffolk/Norfolk.

oakleygenealogy.co.uk
User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 28950
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Relationship to Root Query

Post by tatewise »

There is a potential snag with the expression suggested by Jane.
It only works correctly while your Individual record is the nominated File Root person.

The workaround is to replace FileRoot() with Record( 2, "I" ) in both places where the digit 2 is your Individual record's Record Id, which is shown in a Records Window column and elsewhere often in square brackets.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
User avatar
BenOakster
Platinum
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Aug 2024 16:38
Family Historian: V7
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: Relationship to Root Query

Post by BenOakster »

Adjustment made. Thank you.
Ben Oakley - Researching OAKLEY, HART, HALL, PECK, FARRANCE, CRICK, WELLS, SCARFE in Suffolk/Norfolk.

oakleygenealogy.co.uk
Post Reply