That seems fine - except that I'd really, really, prefer the RG 14 to appear, not least because it gets you in the habit of including the TNA Class as a matter of course. There are instances where the TNA Class is not implicit from the title.Gary_G wrote: ↑20 Feb 2024 22:39......Census returns. England. Aston, Warwickshire. 02 Apr 1911. AARON, Francis, RD 385; PN 18210; ED 21; SN 101. Collection: 1911 England & Wales Census Collection Image. http://www.findmypast.co.uk.
The RG 14 is implicit, as the 1911 census has been identified earlier. However; adding it wouldn't hurt. ...
For instance (and you might not be thinking of using these records yet, if ever), FMP put all the First World War Soldiers' Papers into the FMP collection/record set "British Army Service Records". However, there are two TNA Classes in that collection: WO 363, the First World War Service Records 'Burnt Documents', and WO 364, the First World War Pension Claims. WO 364 papers came from the pensions department but the papers are identical in format to the WO 363 papers and literally nobody understands why the papers in WO 364 ended up in the pensions department - other than "it was something to do with pensions..."
If you were looking for the papers belonging to "Fred Bloggs", in FMP you'd look in the single collection/record set "British Army Service Records". But Ancestry made their collections match the two TNA Classes so you have to do two searches if you're just looking for Soldiers' papers there.
So what FMP did was eminently sensible for searching FMP - but if someone wanted to use an FMP citation to find the stuff in Ancestry (because that's the subscription that they have) then they do need the WO 363 or WO 364.