RikkiR wrote: ↑28 Nov 2021 16:03
... Two of the children (Elizabeth and Marrion) were born on 22/12/1797 ... and the information seems to indicate they were twins. ...
Born? Or baptised? What does the image say? - if it says
born, and the parents are the same, then it's clear that they are twins. If, on the other hand, it only says baptised, then you can't be certain - one (or both) could be a delayed baptism, so you can only be certain that they were baptised on the same day. On the other hand, I believe that Scottish practice tended to have children baptised very close to their birth, which perhaps makes delayed baptisms less likely in Scotland than England. On the other other hand, it's not unknown to see simple lists, particularly if the family was non-CofS but the CofS made, as they could do, a list...
RikkiR wrote: ↑28 Nov 2021 16:03
... On ScotlandsPeople, Elizabeth’s gender is marked “F” however Marrion’s is marked “U”. I took it as the “U” meant gender unknown ...
I would agree that's a sensible interpretation - Marion Robert Morrison (John Wayne!) comes to mind as the classic example of an unexpected Mar(r)ion gender. However, again I would ask - what's on the image? (You may be quoting the image but apologies - it's not clear). The fact that ScotlandsPeople index it as "U" does suggest that the OPR, for some reason, is not clear.
RikkiR wrote: ↑28 Nov 2021 16:03
... I can find no Death Certificate for the first Elizabeth. Would I be correct in assuming that Marrion was stillborn and that is the reason there is no Death Certificate and is it possible that Elizabeth also died at roughly the same time and again, was not recorded or is that an assumption too far.
Ah - pardon me, but you're missing the essential aspect of Scottish burial (seldom death) records from the Old Parish Registers. There aren't any. Well, very few. Most parishes either never bothered with burial records, or did them in a fit of enthusiasm for just a few years - after all, why would they do what the Sassenachs did? (Actually the real reason is that burials and even marriages weren't that important to the CofS - if you look at marriages, many are just records of couples submitting their intention to marry, not the marriage itself). Therefore missing burial records for Marrion and Elizabeth (1) don't mean anything unless you're in an area like central Dundee where the Howff registers record burials in the central cemetery - though even there, people could be buried elsewhere.
So sorry - it's all a bit flakey and uncertain - you are
probably right. (PS - John and Lorna beat me to a lot of this...)