I have been using Ancestral Sources for entering data from E & W censuses and find that parties to a second marriage are consistently given a default condition of "Wid".
It is easy enough to correct but I wonder whether I have missed some setting that causes this behaviour?
* AS doesn't recognise second marriages?
-
LornaCraig
- Megastar
- Posts: 3201
- Joined: 11 Jan 2005 17:36
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Re: AS doesn't recognise second marriages?
No you haven't missed anything. I think it's just one of those things which are not as simple for AS to check as you might expect. It has been mentioned a few times over the years, for example here:
Marital status after second marriage (5007)
Marital status after second marriage (5007)
Lorna