* Deleting trees no longer wanted

Questions regarding use of any Version of Family Historian. Please ensure you have set your Version of Family Historian in your Profile. If your question fits in one of these subject-specific sub-forums, please ask it there.
Post Reply
avatar
Jean
Silver
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Jan 2018 09:18
Family Historian: V6

Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Jean »

Good morning,

On the list of Gedcom tasks, I have two trees not wanted. They are empty and when I click on themn
a notice comes up with "file not found". How can I delete these from the list. Thank you for any help
you can give me. Jean
User avatar
Jane
Site Admin
Posts: 8514
Joined: 01 Nov 2002 15:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Somerset, England
Contact:

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Jane »

Jane
My Family History : My Photography "Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad."
avatar
Jean
Silver
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Jan 2018 09:18
Family Historian: V6

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Jean »

Hello Jane,
Thanks for replying. To be honest I haven't a clue what it all means. In the Focus Window what do I click on.
Did you understand what I was trying to explain. Please try to help if you can.
Jean
User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 28413
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by tatewise »

In Jane's absence may I explain.

You cannot fix the problem anywhere in FH itself. In fact, you must close FH.

Follow the link to Clean Out the Recent File List and download the fhclrmrulist.exe application file.
After the download, double-click that .exe file to run it on your PC and it will completely empty the File > Gedcom File Tasks list, which is held in the Windows Registry.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
avatar
Jean
Silver
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Jan 2018 09:18
Family Historian: V6

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Jean »

Thank you. But will my other trees stay there. I don't want to lose them. I will try what you say
and let you know. Thank you. Jeaan
User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 28413
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by tatewise »

Jean, all the names of the trees will be removed from the list, but the files will still exist on the disk.

I wonder if you are not using FH to its full potential.
If you are relying on the File > Gedcom File Tasks list to open GEDCOM files, maybe you don't realise that it is better to create Projects from them, so they are listed in the File > Project Window. That makes more features available than with just GEDCOM files.

Are you familiar with FH Projects, or would you like to know about creating Projects?
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
avatar
Jean
Silver
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Jan 2018 09:18
Family Historian: V6

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Jean »

Thank you Mike,

It really bothers my 80 year old brain. I am so worried about losing the
three trees I am working on. On the Gedcom Tasks list of tree names,
there are just two tree names I need deleted. They are completely empty just
the tree name remains. It is not a problem really but I like things to be
tidy, lol. Can I get back to you later if I decide on doing this Project thing. Jean
User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2511
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Mark1834 »

Is it possible to delete (rather than update) a Registry key via plugin? If it is technically possible, that seems a much simpler and more reliable option. It would need special permission from the plugin police to write to the Registry, but IMO that's far better than downloading and running a separate exe file.
Mark Draper
avatar
Gowermick
Megastar
Posts: 1704
Joined: 13 Oct 2015 07:22
Family Historian: V7
Location: Swansea

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Gowermick »

Mark,
Judging from Miketate’s reply, you need to stop FH to clear the entries in the registry, so plugins wouldn’t work, as you need FH to be running in order to run a plugin :D
Mike Loney

Website http://www.loney.tribalpages.com
http://www.mickloney.tribalpages.com
User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2511
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Mark1834 »

It depends on whether that particular key is overwritten when FH closes. If it is, there are other plugin techniques that will probably work. It will take 5 mins of experimenting tonight to find out for sure...
Mark Draper
User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2511
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Mark1834 »

Confirmed - the recent file list is saved within FH and cannot be deleted while FH is open, as it is restored automatically on closing.

Rather than downloading and running a separate exe file, you can do exactly the same thing by opening a Windows Command Prompt (search for "cmd" in the Task Bar if you don't already have a shortcut) and typing in the following command (while FH is closed):

Code: Select all

reg delete "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Calico Pie\Family Historian\Recent File List"
If a simple plugin is preferred, all we need is a very short script that includes this line in a batch file, along with a command to close FH, similar to the approach used in the new Backup and Restore FH Settings via Windows plugin.
Mark Draper
User avatar
tatewise
Megastar
Posts: 28413
Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
Family Historian: V7
Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
Contact:

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by tatewise »

IMO such technical discussions are likely to confound Jean even further.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
User avatar
Mark1834
Megastar
Posts: 2511
Joined: 27 Oct 2017 19:33
Family Historian: V7
Location: South Cheshire, UK

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Mark1834 »

Look at it more generally. Is downloading and running an exe file (which is browser-dependent, and likely to require extra steps to convince Windows Defender or your anti-virus that it is safe) really simpler than either a one line command (if you know your way around Windows) or running a plugin, which is a core FH skill??
Mark Draper
avatar
Gowermick
Megastar
Posts: 1704
Joined: 13 Oct 2015 07:22
Family Historian: V7
Location: Swansea

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Gowermick »

tatewise wrote: 26 May 2022 16:52 IMO such technical discussions are likely to confound Jean even further.
I completely agree. Playing with the registry is not for the inexperienced, too much risk of causing trouble if a mistake is made. At least by using an exe file, the user cannot modify it.
Mike Loney

Website http://www.loney.tribalpages.com
http://www.mickloney.tribalpages.com
avatar
Jean
Silver
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Jan 2018 09:18
Family Historian: V6

Re: Deleting trees no longer wanted

Post by Jean »

I see all your discussions, and you are right. I am totally confused.
You are all computer literate more than I will ever be. I have tried to correct
it but have succeeded in making it worse by adding more to the list. I have
decided to leave things as they are, or get another tree maker and start again. My
own tree has almost 800 individuals, so it will be a lot of work. Plus I am
doing two other trees for other people. I appreciate all you are doing in
trying to help me, but this is my last post. Thank you all so much.
Post Reply