* Recording Business Addresses
-
- Superstar
- Posts: 280
- Joined: 13 May 2015 16:28
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Mitzpe Jericho, Israel
Recording Business Addresses
My husband and I are working on a one-place study.
One of our interests is tracking where people lived at different periods in time. To that end, we collect as many addresses as possible using censuses, directories, phone books, electoral rolls, etc.
Up to now, we have been using the Residence fact to record this information. We also use the Property attribute to record addresses which were owned by the person, but not their place of residence.
In analysing this data, it often becomes clear that a particular address was probably a place of business and not a residence. I've thought about perhaps creating a custom event Business or something to that effect for these cases.
I'm wondering if anybody else has dealt with this situation and has any suggestions.
Thanks
One of our interests is tracking where people lived at different periods in time. To that end, we collect as many addresses as possible using censuses, directories, phone books, electoral rolls, etc.
Up to now, we have been using the Residence fact to record this information. We also use the Property attribute to record addresses which were owned by the person, but not their place of residence.
In analysing this data, it often becomes clear that a particular address was probably a place of business and not a residence. I've thought about perhaps creating a custom event Business or something to that effect for these cases.
I'm wondering if anybody else has dealt with this situation and has any suggestions.
Thanks
Shosh Kalson
- tatewise
- Megastar
- Posts: 28410
- Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Recording Business Addresses
If it was a place of business, then the person presumably had an associated job or occupation.
So record their Occupation and the Address will be their business premises.
The advantage is that Occupation is a standard GEDCOM fact rather than a custom fact and thus more widely supported.
So record their Occupation and the Address will be their business premises.
The advantage is that Occupation is a standard GEDCOM fact rather than a custom fact and thus more widely supported.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
-
- Superstar
- Posts: 280
- Joined: 13 May 2015 16:28
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Mitzpe Jericho, Israel
Re: Recording Business Addresses
The source may provide their occupation, but not always, especially in the case of women. Even if there's a trade listed in the directory (like tailor or watch maker), it's highly improbable that the woman actually engaged in that trade (in the 19th century). I would say that it's more likely that she inherited a business when her husband died, kept her name on it, but hired a man to mind the shop.
We also don't put addresses on occupation, at least up to now.
I'd rather keep the addresses separate from occupation.
We also don't put addresses on occupation, at least up to now.
I'd rather keep the addresses separate from occupation.
Shosh Kalson
- tatewise
- Megastar
- Posts: 28410
- Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Recording Business Addresses
Proprietor covers a lot of possibilities.
But otherwise, a custom fact Business would work.
But otherwise, a custom fact Business would work.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
Re: Recording Business Addresses
Or, if you want to avoid 'Custom' Facts you could use Possessions, which could cover Freehold/Copyhold/Leasehold 'title' which was a qualification for a voting entitlement (depending on value), even if the actual use of the premises was by some other party.
Mervyn
Mervyn
- tatewise
- Megastar
- Posts: 28410
- Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Recording Business Addresses
I assumed that was what Shosh meant by: "We also use the Property attribute to record addresses which were owned by the person, but not their place of residence."
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry
-
- Superstar
- Posts: 280
- Joined: 13 May 2015 16:28
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Mitzpe Jericho, Israel
Re: Recording Business Addresses
Yes, that is correct. Property = Possessions
For the purpose of recording business addresses, however, I would not make the assumption that the address was owned by the individual. Therefore, the use of Possessions would be incorrect.
For the purpose of recording business addresses, however, I would not make the assumption that the address was owned by the individual. Therefore, the use of Possessions would be incorrect.
Shosh Kalson
-
- Superstar
- Posts: 269
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004 16:53
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Thatcham, Berkshire, England
Re: Recording Business Addresses
How about adding a fact named 'business' or whatever you want to call it.
You can add any fact you like. I have added one called 'newspaper reports'
Victor
You can add any fact you like. I have added one called 'newspaper reports'
Victor
Last edited by victor on 11 Jan 2021 21:21, edited 1 time in total.
- LornaCraig
- Megastar
- Posts: 3201
- Joined: 11 Jan 2005 17:36
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Re: Recording Business Addresses
Victor, that is what Shosh said she was already considering, in her first post.
Lorna
- tatewise
- Megastar
- Posts: 28410
- Joined: 25 May 2010 11:00
- Family Historian: V7
- Location: Torbay, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Recording Business Addresses
Yes, all too often people don't seem to bother to read the earlier postings.
Mike Tate ~ researching the Tate and Scott family history ~ tatewise ancestry