Family Historian User Group

Anyone with urban Reg Districts in big cities may think differently given how concentrated such areas might be. I'm a big advocate for keeping it simple. A Registration District is a District, no matter how large or small. As Lorna said, offices moved and multiplied and the exact location where an ...

jelv wrote: ↑14 Oct 2024 08:04 The various plugins for recording GRO data (including the one I'm working on) would put Thanet, Kent, England in the place and Registration District in the address.

Just to correct this, the Record Civil Registration Data (UK) DEA plus the Registration District in the Place.

Peter Calver of Lost Cousins is doing a Zoom presentation for the Family Historian Zoom Group (FHZG) on "How to make the most of DNA - Choosing the RIGHT test, using the SIMPLEST techniques" to FHZG on 29th October at 1930 -2100 (UK time). FHZG have very kindly extended an invitation to me...

Like Adrian, I don't consider a Registration District to be an address (because it's a district), so include it in the Place field.

I wish it was in the store as well -- maybe you should comment on the original thread and ask the author to publish it?

Gary, look at Change source template (19143) -- I've found that plugin (not in the store) works pretty well for what you're describing.

If you're a visual learner, Charting, Dynamic Icon Highlights and Color Coding may help.

Your web page allows anyone who wants to very easily find: your name; an gmail email address for you; your home address (and see inside it in October 2023, and how much it cost then). They can make a good stab at your age, by using your parents dates. I've found you on Facebook (by triangulating wit...

Already available: Select the couple in the FAMILY records window.

A Templated Source is just a Generic Source in fancy clothes -- i.e. with some metafields added. The generic source fields aren't usually populated in a Templated source, but you can add them and populate them via the All tab for the source record converned (Right click on the record title and Add f...

Gary, if you read thw original post, you will see that it copies linked Source Template Records.

LAY BAPTISM By the law of the English church as well deduced from the general Canon law as from its own particular constitutions down to the time of the Reformation lay baptism was allowed and practised It was regular and even prescribed in cases of necessity it was so complete and valid that it wa...

In the context of the Church of England a ‘private’ baptism was one which did not take place in the church. Typically it took place in the family’s home soon after the birth and was done as a matter of urgency because the baby was weak and thought unlikely to survive. If the child did survive he/sh...

We're getting into the realms where narrative sentences will never be good enough.

What about when one parent is living and one is not?

What about when two of the children are alive and one isnt?

What tense is appropriate then?

Hi John - Thanks for that. There is one other thing I've noticed;- If you enter a District which the plugin assumes is an invalid format then it brings up the Lua Error Dialog. On this you have the options of Copy, Continue or Exit. The first two are fine but if you use Exit then it shuts everythin...

AdrianBruce wrote: ↑25 Sep 2024 09:07 Someone (maybe Helen?) described some baptisms that seemed to be done privately for reasons of status, while I don't think it was entirely clear where they were done. (I'm sure I'll get chastised if I'm wrong )

Private baptism in one church followed by baptism in another?

Thats probably a red herring, Mike. If you read the wiki page you linked its google doing the detecting and seemingly not removing an out of date reference to Badware.

Thanks for the attributions, Mike.

I enter it as part of the source information, and cite the source for both the birth fact and the mothers name.

Lua Code snippets are not released under any licence nor is any code posted here (unless somebody explicitly includes a licence). So, no attribution is needed. The FH libraries and published plugins are published under the MIT Licence, which requires a copyright statement that includes all copyright...

In my plugins I have statements like:

"Specifically, rights to the encoding functions are reserved to Mike Tate; and rights to the function ProgressBar are reserved to Mike Tate and Jane Taubman"

Simplest would be to add Calico Pie, Jane and me to the list of contributors to your plugin. Coupled with this in the header: @Licence: This plugin is copyright (c) 2020 Fred Bloggs & contributors and is licensed under the MIT License which is hereby incorporated by reference (see https://plugin...

--[[ @Title: fhFileUtils @Type: Module @Author: Calico Pie @Contributors: Jane Taubman, Helen Wright @Version: 1.7 ... ]] Without the accreditation by name, our copyright isn't acknowledged (and in some jurisdictions, isn't protected). Put it on your checklist of improvements for the next release o...

I have FH running on my main Windows PC, and in a virtual machine on the same PC. It's definitely seen as using 2 licences.

Gary

yes, that's how it works. Designed (presumably) to stop people moving two copies of the software around more than 2 PCs on a regular basis.

You could try explaining your issue to Calico Pie support and see if they can offer a solution.